Submission Preparation Checklist

       The undersigned hereby assigns to the Oases-Vox society and to the (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) all rights under copyright that may exist in and to the above Work, any revised or expanded derivative works submitted to (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) by the undersigned based on the Work, and any associated written, audio and/or visual presentations or other enhancements accompanying the Work. The undersigned hereby warrants that the Work is original and that he/she is the author of the Work; to the extent the Work incorporates text passages, figures, data or other material from the works of others, the undersigned has obtained any necessary permission. See folowing sections.

    1. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.

    2. The undersigned agrees to indemnify and hold harmless (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) from any damage or expense that may arise in the event of a breach of any of the warranties set forth above.

    3. it should be clear to the authors that if the journal accept the paper then it will send an acceptance letter to the corresponding author (corresponding author is the submitter of the paper to the (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) journals ), if the authors did not respond and satisfy the requirements including the payment of the publication fees within one month from  the date of sending the acceptance letter; then the journal have the right to consider this as refuse to pay the  fees by the authors and the editor will have the right to reject the paper.

    4. For jointly authored Works, all joint authors should sign, or one of the authors should sign as authorized agent for the others.

    5.It should be clear for authors that the Editor in Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper.  The Editor in Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:

       A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor in Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 15 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor in Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he has the right to accept\reject the paper.

       B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s).

       C. the Editor in Chief himself evaluates the paper.

    6. This journal and the Oases-Vox society are permitted to republish the author paper in any other journals or books, also the journal is allowed and permitted to publish the author paper in any back volume or issue.

    7. By submitting the publication fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.

    8. Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.

    9. The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.

     

       (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) distribute their scientific publications throughout the world and want to ensure that the material submitted to its publications is properly available to the readership of those publications. Authors must ensure that The Work is their own and is original. It is the responsibility of the authors, not (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT), to determine whether disclosure of their material requires the prior consent of other parties and, if so, to obtain it.

    1. Authors/employers retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.

    2. Authors/employers may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce The Work and for the author's personal use or for company or organizational use, provided that the source and any (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.

    3. Authors/employers may make limited distribution of all or portions of the Work prior to publication if they inform (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) in advance of the nature and extent of such limited distribution.

    4. For all uses not covered by items 2 and 3, authors/employers must request permission from (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT).

    5. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.

    6.It should be clear for authors that the Editor in Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper.  The Editor in Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:

       A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor in Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 15 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor in Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he has the right to accept\reject the paper.

       B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s).

       C. the Editor in Chief himself evaluates the paper.

     

    1.   (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) Copyright Ownership

       It is the formal policy of (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) to own the copyrights to all copyrightable material in their technical publications and to the individual contributions contained therein, in order to protect the interests of (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT), their authors and their employers, and, at the same time, to facilitate the appropriate re-use of this material by others.

    2.   Author/Employer Rights

        If you are employed and prepared the Work on a subject within the scope of your employment, the copyright in the Work belongs to your employer as a work-for-hire. In that case, (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) assume that when you sign this Form, you are authorized to do so by your employer and that your employer has consented to the transfer of copyright, to the representation and warranty of publication rights, and to all other terms and conditions of this Form. If such authorization and consent has not been given to you, an authorized representative of your employer should sign this Form as the Author.

    3.   Reprint/Republication Policy

       (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) require that the consent of the first-named author and employer be sought as a condition to granting reprint or republication rights to others or for permitting use of a Work for promotion or marketing purposes.

     


    Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

    Publication decisions

       The editors of (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

    Fair play

       An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

    Confidentiality

       The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

    Disclosure and conflicts of interest

       Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

     

    Contribution to Editorial Decisions

       Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

    Promptness

       Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

    Confidentiality

       Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

    Standards of Objectivity

       Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

    Acknowledgement of Sources

       Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

    Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

       Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

     

     

    Reporting standards

       Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

    Data Access and Retention

       Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

    Originality and Plagiarism

       Authors should ensure that submitted work is original and has not been published elsewhere in any language, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

       Applicable copyright laws and conventions should be followed. Copyright material (e.g. tables, figures or extensive quotations) should be reproduced only with appropriate permission and acknowledgement.

    Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

       An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

    Acknowledgement of Sources

       Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

    Authorship of the Paper

       Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

    The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

    Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

       If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

    Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

       All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

    Fundamental errors in published works

       When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

     

    Plagiarism Policy:

       Detecting Plagiarism is not an easy task, ideally it require the cooperation between (all) publishing houses around the world.

    The (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) journals follows the guidelines contained in the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) flowcharts that can be downloaded from the following link (http://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts). Kindly pay attention to the following charts within the COPE link:

    PLAGIARISM CLAIMS 

       Notifications regarding any plagiarism issue should be directed to the (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) editors at  editor@oasesvox.com

     

    (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT) are open access journals which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in these journals without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the definition of open access.

     

     

    Process for identification of and dealing with allegations of research misconduct

       The Oases-Vox Society, the (IJITAS, IJIRHS & IJJRPT)and the editors are committed to take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research misconduct has occurred, including plagiarism, citation manipulation, and data falsification/fabrication, among others. The journal or its editors will not encourage such misconduct under any circumstances, or knowingly allow such misconduct to take place. In the event that the Oases-Vox or the editors are made aware of any allegation of research misconduct relating to a published article in this journal – we shall follow COPE's guidelines in dealing with allegations.

     


    Conflict of interest Policy (COIP)

    Conflict of interest (COI) exists when there is a divergence between an individual’s private interests (competing interests) and his or her responsibilities to scientific and publishing activities such that a reasonable observer might wonder if the individual’s behavior or judgment was motivated by considerations of his or her competing interests.

    Financial ties:

       This conflict is present when a participant in the publication process has received or expects to receive money (or other financial benefits such as patents or stocks), gifts, or services that may influence work related to a specific publication.  

    Academic commitments:

       Participants in the publications process may have strong beliefs (“intellectual passion”) that commit them to a particular explanation, method, or idea.  They may, as a result, be biased in conducting research that tests the commitment or in reviewing the work of others that is in favor or at odds with their beliefs.

    Personal relationships:

       Personal relationships with family, friends, enemies, competitors, or colleagues can pose COIs.  For example, a reviewer may have difficulty providing an unbiased review of articles by investigators who have been working colleagues.

       Political or religious beliefs:

       Strong commitment to a particular political view (e.g., political position, agenda, or party) or having a strong religious conviction may pose a COI for a given publication if those political or religious issues are affirmed or challenged in the publication.

    Institutional affiliations:

       A COI exists when a participant in the publication process is directly affiliated with an institution that on the face of it may have a position or an interest in a publication. 

       COIs are ubiquitous and cannot be eliminated altogether. However, they can be managed constructively so that they make the least possible intrusion on journal content and credibility.

      All declarations about COI should be requested in writing as a condition of reviewing a manuscript and asked in such a way that authors will have a high likelihood of reporting their COIs related to the manuscript.

    The consequences for failing to declare COI. 

       Any COI will be treated based on flowcharts for the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE); those charts that can be downloaded from the following link (http://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts). 

    Which COIs will result in a manuscript not being considered further?  

       All types of COI mentioned in the previous text will results in stop processing and rejecting the manuscript until the COI is solved.

    Authors:

       All authors should report any COI related to their research to the editor.  

    Reviewers:

       All reviewers should report any COI related to their reviewing tasks to the editor.  

    Editors:

       Editors should not make any editorial decisions or be involved in the editorial process if they have or a close family member has a COI (financial or otherwise) in a particular manuscript submitted to their journal. 

    Please publish modules in offcanvas position.

    Free Joomla! templates by Engine Templates